Once it is clear that we can elimate all traffic lights and crossings, there is no more excuses for allowing fatal traffic accidents and jams. The most critical is the fatalities due to traffic accidents as a result of crossings,f even in the presense of traffic lights or roundabouts. We can elimate them by using no-crossing u-turns. The cost is so little that there will not longer be valid excuses for highway planners to allow any crossing at any junctiions, even to provide traffic lights. If there ever were fatal accidents at these crossings, the road users can sue for damages to the highway authorities. Ingorance is not a defence. I notice that, even in Sabah, there are so many junctions where crossing are allowed when we have enough space to provide merging lanes. Worse, these merging lanes were converted to crossings. There were many accidents at the crossings. A few of them are fatal and this time, the victims can sue the government for negligence in allowing crossings at j...
Thank again. Your responses are more reasonable this time but I would like you to consider a few assumptions that you make. These assumptions are what make the proposals in the study not effective. Please refer to my comments alongside your statements, and my previous statements, below. Yours sincerely, Saya yang menjalankan amanah. (I, who executes the trust) Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj. Ahmad Associate Professor Electronic (Computer) Engineering Faculty of Engineering University Malaysia Sabah Jalan UMS 88400 Kota Kinabalu Tel: 088-320000 ext 3052, 0178980858 email: othman58@ums.edu.my On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 11:10 PM Edward Leigh < edward@smartertransport.uk > wrote: Dear Othman bin Ahmad, Quick thoughts in response to your reply … 1. "an intervention like this, which increases road capacity" My proposal is not about increasing capacity. It is about improving capacity of lanes that already exist. It is ...